Archive for March, 2006

On India not actually having a go

Wednesday, March 8th, 2006

India had a go at the target much later than they should have. Winning matches when the smallest of windows exists is what makes a great team. With 40 overs to go and 250 to chase, why did India not go for at least quick singles so that they would be in a position to chase the target later on?

They made a dash with 8 an over required and when it was too late. A lot of praise in the media was heaped on them. I wasn’t impressed by the lack of steel which would have been required to go for the target earlier.

Unfortunately, I didn’t highlight this aspect earlier engrossed in other sports. Thank god Tim de Lisle does the needful in his latest piece.

Revenge is sweet

Tuesday, March 7th, 2006

Barcelona drew with Chelsea 1-1 in the second leg of the Champions League pre quarter finals to advance on aggregate (3-2) having won the first leg 2-1.

Revenge is sweet. Last year was heart breaking for the fans of Barcelona including yours truly. The exit after losing to Chelsea in the two leg Champions League pre quarters was very hard to digest. After all Barcelona was playing excellent football. Being excellent is not good enough though. The game is so uncertain that it can change within minutes. You have to fight against the unpredictable nature of the game itself. That is when a team keeps winning which translates to real greatness.

Coming to the game. Chelsea started off controversially arriving late in the tunnel. Jose Mourinho was already there but the team wasn’t. It meant that the start was delayed by three minutes. The early game saw some excellent passes between Lionel Messi and Ronaldinho. A great and a possible future great combining to create magic. Messi limped off in the 25th minute, which may explain why he missed the weekend La Liga match, to be replaced by Henrik Larsson.

The first half was tight with Barcelona having more possession. They had a lot more chances as well. Chelsea managed a few chances which were more dangerous but without result. Crespo replaced Drogba in the 58th minute while Mourinho theatricals were showing no signs of reducing in the back ground. Crespo soon had a real chance of scoring but strike was wide to the anguish of Chelsea.

Ronaldinho kept up his skill and as the clock ticked on, the task at hand kept becoming tougher. It became near impossible when Ronaldinho scored the first goal of the match in the 78th minute. John Terry’s defense had no answer to the Ronaldinho brilliance. All Chelsea could do was hope to score two goals to force an over time. Had the shot of Eto’o gone in instead of hitting the pole for a 2-0 score line, the victory would have been more convincing.

It didn’t matter. Neither did the penalty scored by Frank Lampard in the 90th minute when John Terry was fouled in the box. The 1-1 score line was enough for Barcelona to advance into the quarters of the Champions League, having already won the first leg 2-1. Mourinho can lay no charges on Messi for play acting. He cannot lay charges on Rijkaard. He may well have some thing to say. I don’t care if he appreciates Barcelona or lays more allegations on it actually.

I know what the score line says. To state I am happy would be to say there has been death when there was man slaughter. Moments like these when the feelings are so over whelming reiterates the beauty of sport. There are wins, there are lessons. There aren’t any losses.

Barcelona: Valdes, Oleguer, Puyol, Marquez, Van Bronckhorst, Deco, Edmilson, Motta, Messi (Larsson 25), Ronaldinho, Eto’o.

Subs Not Used: Jorquera, Belletti, Giuly, Sylvinho, Van Bommel, Iniesta.

Booked: Motta, Puyol.

Goals: Ronaldinho 78.

Chelsea: Cech, Paulo Ferreira, Ricardo Carvalho, Terry, Gallas, Joe Cole (Huth 83), Makelele, Lampard, Duff (Gudjohnsen 58), Robben, Drogba (Crespo 58).

Subs Not Used: Cudicini, Maniche, Geremi, Wright-Phillips.

Booked: Joe Cole.

Goals: Lampard 90 pen.

Att: 98,000

Ref: Markus Merk (Germany).

The Plight of the Woman Sportsperson

Tuesday, March 7th, 2006

More than 150 Indian Bloggers have joined The Blank Noise Project to highlight the harassment of women on Indian streets. Why should any one have to bear indignity because of the gender?

I have had my women friends speak on harassment, leering they have to go through. Not being a woman, I am not the right person to speak from personal experience on the issue. Only a woman can truly express how she feels on the issue.

I am all for equality though and in that vein, am strongly behind the intentions of the cause. I would like to highlight on the state of equality in sport in general taking this opportunity. Most sports have a far less following for the women’s game compared to the men’s game. Tennis, athletics apart how many games can you think of where you can recount names of women sports people? Do they try less or are the games less interesting to watch?

Why is there hardly a following for Women’s football, cricket, basketball, et all? Apart from the lack of general interest of people, the participation of women is also far behind because of society at large. Indian, Pakistani women are discouraged to play in the sun as it is apparently going to cause their skin to become darker, hence ugly. People don’t want to marry dark women. White skin is supposedly more  beautiful.  India does not have the WNBA but the Women’s Railways Basketball team has just as dedicated and sincere players.

Most of those who do manage to play the game have to retire way before they reach their prime. Pressure from parents and society to marry is too much to resist beyond a point. These problems are specifically worse in the subcontinent. When sports people sacrifice marriage, kids in many countries, in the subcontinent such bold decisions are looked down upon rather than being applauded.

(more…)

Sack the selection panel

Sunday, March 5th, 2006

The selection panel keeps making a joke of themselves. I had spoken regarding the inconsistencies which they are displaying. It keeps getting worse.

First, Mr. More decides to state that Sourav Ganguly will not find a place in the squad in the tenure of the current selection panel:

We took a decision that we have to look ahead. We decided that so much has been said on this issue, that we wanted to send a message across that, this is what we are looking at, and as far as this committee is concerned, this is what we have decided, that we will not look back at. We are definitely looking beyond Ganguly even if he were to perform well in domestic cricket.

How can they say the selection committee has shut the door completely on any player? We do not know what a player will do in the future, what situation the team is going to be in. If Ganguly decides to carry on playing, which he has, it is his right. To rule out any player, despite his age or just because he isn’t performing to satisfactory levels of a panel speaks of autocracy. The statements made by Kiran More have been irresponsbile. They show an irrational streak and lack of judgement – lack of qualities which show a chairman of a selection panel cannot do the job at hand with discretion and maturity which is required.

Other teams have looked ahead in the past and it is not uncommon to look beyond specific players. Australia have done it with Steve Waugh Mark Waugh, Michael Bevan, Darren Lehmann and Matthew Hayden. India may well have done it with V.V.S.Laxman and Anil Kumble recently. Even during the captaincy of Ganguly, Robin Singh was discarded on the same lines.

But a player discarded can make a come back. Michael Kasporqicz and Colin Miller have done it in the recent past for Australia. A team may be going through a run of losses. It may face a severe injury crisis like England is at the moment. Which player will be needed when, no one can predict. It is this reason why a selection panel member, not least the chairman, does not make such outlandish statements. I am hearing rumours from some quarters that Ganguly might go to court over this. I do not see what other option he has.

And now the comes news that the selectors have included Munaf Patel in the squad to play England for the second test in the place of V.R.V.Singh. The tour game between England and the Board President’s XI (BP XI) was in progress. The selection panel rushed into announcing the squad for the first test in the middle of the game. They chose V.R.V.Singh over Munaf Patel. In the tour game, Munaf Patel took 10 wickets and helped BP XI to an eight wicket victory. V.R.V.Singh managed one wicket in the match.

We find that for the second test, V.R.V.Singh is out of the squad and Munaf Patel is in. Makes you wonder why they couldn’t have waited for the tour game to finish before announcing squad for the 1st test. If they did have a strong enough ground to chose V.R.V.Singh over Patel, why not stick to their decision. Inconsistency, finnicky nature and short sightedness come to the fore here.

The selection panel keeps making a mockery of itself. The absence of accountability has been a bane from time immemorial. I have never seen the randomness and lack of planning in selecting sides like I have witnessed for the past few months though. I am not highlighting a specific player being there or not. The issue is larger – that of the lack of any logic used for selecting teams.

If the BCCI was indeed a professional organisation rather than a money churning body existing in the monopoly which is Indian cricket, there is no doubting that the current Indian selectors would have been sacked. Sadly, with the demand-supply mismatch, the five wise men, commonly known as the selectors, also referred to as a bunch of jokers by Mohinder Amarnath are running amock.

I do call for the sack of the selection panel here. I doubt if any one is listening though.

Petrova, Nadal over Mauresmo, Federer

Sunday, March 5th, 2006

Nadia Petrova denied Amelie Mauresmo a number 1 spot. She will have to wait another week. I wasn’t expecting it. Good on you Petrova.

Meanwhile Rafael Nadal defeats Federer one more time. He now has a 3-1 record versus Federer. Perfect come back for Nadal. First defeat for Federer in the year and a build up to a possible long term rivalry for men’s tennis. The clay season with the climax at Roland Garros will certainly be engrossing.

Selling Wimbledon Trophies, rematches and a match away from No. 1

Friday, March 3rd, 2006

Bjorn Borg will sell, among other tennis memorablia, his 5 Wimbledon Trophies for financial security. Pains me immensely that his financial ventures didn’t succeed.

Meanwhile Federer and Nadal are to face each other for the first time since French Open 2005. Federer is unbeaten this year. Nadal is on a come back trial ahead of the French Open. A superb build up to a match.

Martina Hingis crashed to a 2-6, 2-6 loss against Amelie Mauresmo. Hingis’ tryst with destiny part 2 isn’t looking great. She is still new in her come back but she better start winning a few titles sooner rather than later. At least she is enjoying her self on court which is good to see. A sharp contrast to the too serious Hingis. I will write in detail on Hingis some time next week hopefully.

Meanwhile Mauresmo is one match away from reclaiming the number 1 spot. She certainly is proving the most dominant women’s player this year, already having won her first grand slam in the Australian Open in January, and not many reckon Nadia Petrova has a chance in the Doha Open final.

Australia – staring down the barrel

Friday, March 3rd, 2006

I wrote on how it is back to the drawing board for Australia a few weeks back. They are performing very poorly in the current series and the latest misery has been the 196 run loss to South Africa, folding up for mere 93.

Back to the drawing board indeed despite some players missing.

Cricket ramble

Thursday, March 2nd, 2006

One word which charecterises this English team and separates it from teams of the past is fight. Whatever the match situation, whatever the crisis situation, the team will give it their best shot. A sharp contrast to the frequent collapses we saw from English teams of the past. You will say that they did collapse in Pakistan but that was a one off rather than a norm.

I doubt if any one expected England to fight back the way they did after being down 246/7 at the end of day 1. No one certainly expected them to end up with 393. Bravo Paul Collingwood. He showed a few English batsmen who let a situation of advantage (winning the toss and thus having India to bat last on a crumbling pitch) slip the worth of staying at the wicket and limiting stroke play for the larger team cause. The support from the tail was admirable. It highlighted that word again – fight.

Of course the highlight of the match so far has been the youngsters coming to the party. If it was Alastair Cook showing common sense yesterday and Sreesanth showing that he has loads of talent, swinging ability (not related to his break dance ability) and yes, common sense. Its funny how in test cricket loads of talent means nothing if you do not have common sense. You don’t need to be flashy, you don’t need to be a Sachin Tendulkar or a Brian Lara. You can be a Paul Collingwood, a Sreesanth or a Alastair Cook and still do a good job. The saying – test cricket is as much played in the head as in the field – is very true.

Coming back to today – I have a strong feeling we are seeing the future of both these teams in this match. If Suresh Raina and Piyush Chawla get a run later on in the series, it might well be looked back as the series where certain people showed their mettle for the first time. Like India in Pakistan(1989) is looked back upon for instance.

Two more stars shined today. While Steve Harmison and Andrew Flintoff could not do a good enough job to help Monty Panesar strangle the batsmen at the other end, Panesar showed enough talent in his short spell. He is patient. He has variation. And he can keep coming back at you. The English fans will be delighted. Ashley Giles might be a tad concerned. Blackwell wasn’t expected and could not put any pressure.

After Sehwag drove too early, fooled by the slower ball from Hoggard, into the hands of Pieterson, the Indians were standing on thin ice. Another wicket would mean staring at trouble. Chasing any thing above 250 batting last is going to be tough on this pitch. With Panesar bowling some testing stuff, it was a crucial period to last. Luckily for India, they had exactly the men for the task.

I have been a fan of Wasim Jaffer from before he was first selected for India. So it was a delight to see him make an unbeaten 73. He batted with assurance, patience and authority – all at the same time. Jaffer and Dravid left several balls; played only when they felt the delivery could be scored off or a defensive shot was necessary. Dean Jones rightly said during commentary that it is important to leave balls as much as to play them to make big scores in cricket. It is no surprise then than Wasim Jaffer has made big scores domestically and Dravid has done the same internationally.

The match is rivettingly poised with India at 136/1. India would want a lead of at least around 75-100 to feel safe. England will be looking to restrict India, realistically, to a lead of not more than 50.

On a slightly different note, Chappell has spoken up on Ganguly and Ganguly has reported it to the BCCI. Why should Chappell speak on this? He wasn’t required to. Chappell and Ganguly have always been controversial individuals. So once they get entangled in a controversy, it will continue. If one of them stops stirring, the other man will start off.

Pistol Pete for World Team Tennis

Wednesday, March 1st, 2006

Pete Sampras was called the tennis kid when he went to college. All he used to do was play tennis. His focus, dedication is unmatched. He would even hide pains/minor cramps he used to suffer during a match because according to him it showed weakness to his opponent. He used to hide emotion so well that John McEnroe even complained about it.

How much time does it take Pete Sampras to get bored of life without tennis? A little more than three years. He downplays his contract to play World Team Tennis, requests not to call it a come back and says:

This is more about just getting myself a little busier and focused on something I used to be good at.

Sampras is also scheduled to play an exhibition match in Houston apart from the WTT matches. He is undecided regarding the future but we may well see him in a commentary role. Sampras says that this is completely different from playing professionally:

But to play at the level I used to play is a whole other animal. I’ve done that, and I know what it takes. Me playing a little tennis this year is something I can control; there isn’t any pressure. I can relax and have a little fun. Coming back is not something that crossed my mind.

It is unlikely that Sampras will make an ATP Tour comeback. A come back would mean a dedication, committment and high level of sacrifice. Add to that getting into top physical and game condition. Add to that putting more effort than ever before because at 34 his body isn’t getting younger.

Also, why would Sampras, who has achieved almost every thing the game has to offer (barring the French Open and I don’t think he would target that if he came back) want to return? If Sampras does make an unlikely return because of his unquenchable desire for the game, I am sure he would do it only if he thinks he can match the best. That would mean another competitive match between Sampras and Federer. A mouth watering prospect but unlikely.

I would be happy to listen to him commentate on the game. He has given so many moments of pleasure to his fans. It would be selfish to ask for more. Any match Sampras plays now (like he will at WTT) is an unexpected bonus treat.

Interview with Jack McNamara

Wednesday, March 1st, 2006

Not since Ray Bright has a specialist left arm orthodox spinner represented Australia at the senior level. Some recent non-specialists to do it include former Australian captain Allan Border and Michael Clarke. Jack McNamara is latest of a rare Australian breed. He has already toured India and Sri Lanka as part of the Australian under-19 team. He speaks about his experiences so far, on playing for Australia and many other aspects in an interview I had with him.

How did you take to cricket? Tell us a bit about your progress to an Australia under-19 cricketer.

My father, like a lot of people who grew up in rural Australia, suscribed to the stereotypically Australian ‘Football in winter, cricket in Summer’ theory, so I guess a bit of that caught onto me. I was always a bit better at cricket, and since we live so close to a park, I ended up heading to train with the Under 12s when I was 7. I bowled medium pace (well, I thought it was quick) until I was 12, when the coach of the U/14 local representative team saw my left arm spinners and told me I’d be a better chance of making the side bowling spin. Since then it’s been a pretty good ride – Victorian U/17s and U/19s, and was fortunate enough to be selected for the Australian side on my performances at the most recent U/19 National Carnival, in combination with my results for the Camberwell Magpies in Melbourne’s Premier Cricket.

Who are your heroes/idols?

Daniel Vettori is probably the guy who I most enjoy watching. I guess being left arm, and having played a number of times – and bowled extremely well – in Australia, means that he’s someone I can watch and learn off, more than a right arm off-spinner. His lines are always pretty good, but its his length that I most enjoy, and his willingness to get hit to take a wicket. That’s something that I think he’s more prepared to do than any other spinner in the world.

Also, Ray Bright – the ex-Australian and Victorian spinner, has been a mentor, of sorts, since I was about 14. He’s involved heavily in Victorian cricket as a selector, but is often there at the youth programs working with us young spinners, taken his own time to conduct a few one-on-one sessions, and has been a great sounding board to bounce ideas off, having so much experience himself.

How does it feel to be representing your country at such a young age?

Lucky. Not many people ever get to represent their country, and I consider myself extremely fortunate to do so before I’m out of my teens.

What did you learn from the under-19 world cup experience?

I don’t think I learnt anything from the U/19 WC about my bowling that I didn’t already know. I need to ensure that my stock ball becomes more potent and threatening, something that’s more prevalent in Australian conditions where there isn’t the turn that you see in Sri Lanka. But directly from the WC, I guess I learnt that as I play higher levels of cricket – especially one day cricket – that I probably have to accept that 4 an over is more “par for the course”, whereas in cricket back home, that means I’ve bowled poorly. Also, in combination with my experiences from an earlier U/19 tour, that against the subcontinent sides, its generally harder to bowl the 10 overs straight, because they get so used to you towards the end of your spell. Often I had 5 overs for less than 18 or so, but ended up going for more than 40.

You just got 3 wickets from 5 matches but you did finish with a satisfactory economy rate of around 4 an over. How is bowling in the subcontinent different from bowling in Australia? What changes did you have to make?

I guess the main adjustment I had to make – and didn’t really do it all that well in the end – was that I had to be more of a strike bowler for the side on pitches that aren’t going to give much help to the pace bowlers. As you said, 3 wickets in 5 games shows that it wasn’t a role I performed that successfully. Bowling in the subcontinent is different simply because you get rewarded a lot more for the amount of revolutions you put on the ball – in Australia, if you try to spin one hard, it’s pot luck as to whether it will spin or not, but in the subcontinent it seemed to spin, and bounce, a lot more when you put in that extra effort. The only real change I made was that I had to bowl a little bit “straighter” as such, pitching more around leg rather than off stump like I usually do. This was due to a combination of the extra turn as well as the team’s focus of bowling really tight lines and restricting the width that the other sides take toll of very well. In the end, this resulted in me bowling a lot more wides down leg side than what I usually would, which was a bit disappointing.

Having said all of that, I was pretty conscious of not trying to change too much and stick to what I do well. You hear about spinners heading over to your Indias and Sri Lankas and bowling a lot flatter, just trying to get the ball to turn. I know that’s not my strength – more my flight and control – so I tried to stick to what I do well, without altering too much of the make-up of my spinners that got me picked in the first place.

What’s the intensity and standard like at the under 19 level?

The intensity and standard at U/19 level is really hard to gauge. Being in a tough group, it was as though we were playing finals all the time, and I’d probably compare both the standard and the intensity to what I found the Melbourne Grade Cricket finals to be last year, or maybe the Cricket Australia Cup game I played (2nd XI State Competition). The hardest thing about the games were that the opposition were so confident – and executed their cricket a lot better after that – once they got on top, but we always felt that if we gained control of the game, that the other sides didn’t have the fight that you’d expect. What makes the standard hard to gauge is the different conditions, playing on different pitches, weather, outfields. But nonetheless, it was high class competition, and a privilege to take part in.

Which players impressed you during the tournament?

Piyush Chawla is a real classy act, as indicated by the fact that he was chosen in the test squad for India to play against England. He bowls leg spinners, with a really high action, and almost ends past the perpendicular. But he has a fantastic wrong’un, flights the ball really well, and is supremely accurate. Is also very handy with the bat, a guy who could be a real pest with the bat for oppositions, and make 100s from number 7 or 8.

Chris Alexander from South Africa, was probably the quickest bowler that we faced. Bowled outswing mainly, but because of his height didn’t really extract that much bounce. He took a couple of early poles against us, and seems to have watched a lot of Andre Nel’s antics. Ended up with 4/40, and if not for him getting frustrated over a few good shots, could have ended up with a much better end result.

Sri Lanka’s captain, Angelo Mathews, also showed a fair bit of talent. He injured himself in the game prior to playing us – and in the time honoured tradition of Sri Lankan captains, still managed to get a runner – but bowled at good nippy pace, as well as hitting a very clean ball. Seemed to be a much better batsman than a number 6, where he batted throughout the tournament. A batting all-rounder with a lot of ability.

India’s Rohit Sharma, who was technically the best batsmen I have ever seen. He had the most all-round game of any of the Indians – as well as eating up width and balls on the pads, he played a lot straighter than most, and had back foot strokes to die for. He looked to me to be the sub-continent batsman who is most likely to succeed in any conditions. Having seen him play a lot of games now, the only hurdle he needs to overcome in my opinion, is making really good scores. He’s made some of the best 30s a man could hope to see; once he starts making 100s in a similar vein, he’ll go a long way.

It might have been Anwar Ali who took all the wickets in the final, but considering that his action means he’ll probably be in a wheelchair at the age of 25, his opening partner Jamshed (can’t remember his second name, can you find it for me Pratyush?) bowled beautifully in both the semi and final. Bowling left arm inswingers, at a fantastic length, once he starts to move it both ways he’ll become a real problem for the best of batsmen. He even looks like Wasim Akram!

In your short career you have played in quite a few grounds. Which hold special place in your heart?

I guess my home ground in Melbourne, the Camberwell Sports Ground, simply because you get to know it so well. I really loved playing in Mohali in India, and Sinhalese Sports Club’s ground was very successful for us during the World Cup – prompting us to joke between ourselves if we could play our day/night semi final there, even though there weren’t any lights at the ground.

Finally, are you Australia’s answer to Ashley Giles?

Haha. Nah, I bowl around the wicket! Seriously, if I achieved a half of what Giles has managed to do, it’d be an honour. But I certainly won’t be basing my game on his – what I need to do is take more wickets to progress as a cricket player, and adopting Giles’ mentality – which, mind you, perfectly suits the needs of the English side – won’t help me.