Part 3 of 32: The English Interview
For Part 3, I caught up with Football Commentator. He is one of the best football bloggers around in the cyber space. He is so neutral that it is difficult to decipher which country he is from! Now officially, we can declare that the dude is English. Football Commentator is dedicated to covering up and coming players, trends in football, major tournaments, European domestic leagues and commentary of rule changes. I thank Football Commentator for agreeing for to interview.
Tell us a bit about the Road to the World Cup – the qualification, and the emotions the fans went through at the time.
England didn’t really have the hardest qualifying, yet didn’t storm through the group, winning most matches by the single goal. They had a relatively easy group but a coach who is a constant source of tabloid reading. Poland proved to be the only close competition for the top spot.
Give us a brief summary of your country’s footballing history.
England has won the World Cup once in 1966 at home and has featured in almost every tournament except for the first 3 and couldn’t compete during the next 2 because of WW2. Since 1950 they have missed the 1974, 1978 and 1994 Cups. Other than the single win their results have been a bit of a let down.
What style of football does the national team play?
England, sometimes to their detriment, play one of the more open styles of international football around. England try to play like they play in the Premiership, just like their squads do in the Champions League. Often this fails when faced with teams which like to foul and grind. They play the right way though and I wouldn’t trade it.
What do you think your country’s prospects are?
Quite good, actually. This England squad is the best I’ve seen in a long time, especially in midfield. They have a world class player in virtually every position and can score goals both from midfield and through their strikers.
Who will be the most important player for your country?
I think its Frank Lampard and John Terry of Chelsea. They are very influential for different reasons. Lampard brings tons of energy and keeps opposition from defending too deep because he can shoot. Terry is quite the leader at the back and brings a certain toughness that the side needs.
Which player in your country’s side would you most like to get rid of?
David Beckham. I’ve watched him thoroughly un-impress at Real Madrid this season and (to me) plays because of reputation and not form. He’s has some moments and yes, has a fantastic free kick, but I think England would do better to avoid the long ball game as much as possible and focus on possession and using their quickest players.
Who are the players to watch from the other countries?
Lionel Messi, Javier Mascherano and Riquelme of Argentina, Tomas Rocisky of the Czech Republic, Rio Mavuba of France (if he plays), Hedwiges Maduro of the Netherlands, Pedro Mantorras of Angola, Luca Toni of Italy and Shunsuke Nakamura of Japan.
What will be your excuse in the event of failure?
The coach. Sven-Goran Eriksson has done some good things for England but he’s also been a distraction. If England reach a semi-final I would suggest it’s a strong performance but otherwise a failure.
Have you got the right manager?
No. While I don’t like the in your face militant managers, Eriksson is too passive. Recently when Wayne Rooney was acting crazy on the pitch for England he didn’t do enough about it. He should have suspended him a few games to show him what the rules are.
What advice would you give him?
Possession. Play through the midfield since it’s among the best in the world and hold the ball. Long ball tactics are good for a team that can’t build towards a goal and need a lucky break or for use on teams with insufficient foot skills to maintain possession. England doesn’t suffer from any of that and should play to their strengths.
How important will this tournament be for England’s long-term prospects, given that Eriksson will be leaving after the tournament?
Only winning the tournament will have an effect on the players. They will be seen as rising above the coach and achieving a great deal. Otherwise its back to their wealthy lifestyles and big cars.
Which team do you most want to beat?
If you interview 20 people, 19 will probably say Brazil. I will also.
Which opposition player will get the most stick?
Probably the ones who play in England. The German players always get a hard time. Argentina always gets a frown because of recent history. Drogba and Arjan Robben will because they are world class divers.
Where will you watch the matches?
Home sweet home. Although I would love to see the matches live, I hate being ripped off which is what happens during events like this.
How keenly will the World Cup be followed in your country?
Religiously.
Who will be the player of the tournament?
A few come to mind, it could be Kaka from Brazil, Cristano Ronaldo from Portugal, Ronaldinho of Brazil, Theirry Henry from France and Frank Lampard of England.
Who will win the Golden Boot?
My money would be on Adriano of Brazil or Theirry Henry of France. Fernando Torres of Spain could surprise, as well as Wayne Rooney of England and Ruud van Nistelrooy of the Netherlands, if they advance to the later rounds it might be Andiry Shevchenko of Ukraine.
Which team will disappoint the most?
It might look a fool and see them reach the final again but I think Germany are a long way from being a contender and will crash out. Home soil might save them. Another potential disaster could be Italy who are in the group of death with players whose legs are worn down from a tough domestic season.
Who will be the surprise team of the tournament?
I think it will be Ivory Coast. They were very impressive in the African Cup of nations and have talent all over the squad. They are fairly disciplined and have something to prove.
Another surprise might see Portugal win the tournament. It could only happen if their strikers produce which didn’t happen at Euro 2004.
Finally, Who will win the World Cup?
Brazil. They are just too talented. They have enough players to fill up 3 national sides and be competitive. The World Cup means more to Brazil than any nation on earth and the players bring with them the confidence that they know how to win at this level.
***
I hope you enjoyed part 3. Follow up questions for Football Commentator can be emailed to me at pratyushkhaitan[@]gmail[.]com Also, feel free to contact me if you would like to be interviewed or know a friend who would like/could be interviewed. Specific questions for specific countries which might pop in your mind in due course may also be sent. Coming up next is the interview from South Korea.
For the rest of the interviews, check out the World Cup interview series page.
Tags: English Football, FIFA World Cup 2006, Football Interview Series.





April 18th, 2006 at 3:40 pm
the next time any one gives a south american country winning the world cup, plz remind them that none have won a WC on European soil. I don’t see that record breaking this year!
April 18th, 2006 at 10:24 pm
I will Mayank! I do think Brazil will win too though. Records are meant to be broken. :D
April 19th, 2006 at 3:49 am
Brazil won the world cup in sweden in ‘54. I think that Argentina are too strong not to make an impact but England will probably fail.
The problem with England which the football commentator didn’t mention was the habit eriksson has of picking the strongest 11 players in spite of the team. Also when England are under pressure they drop too deep and invite more pressure, something that hasn’t been worked on.
April 20th, 2006 at 1:22 pm
I am a European supporter too… but cannot help admiring Argentina… they have one of the best midfields… with Messi, Requilme, Mascherano, and possibly Veron
And I used to be an English supporter in my early days… esp. till 1996 when they reached Euro semis (days of Gascoigne)… but since then have shifted base to France
April 20th, 2006 at 4:57 pm
Libero: England will choke in the penalties. As usual. ;)
Nirav: Till a few months ago, Argentina were being regarded as the favourites if I am not wrong. They certainly are still second in line after Brazil and a lot of people back them to win the World Cup.
France, I would be surprised if they do very well despite the huge talent they possess.
April 20th, 2006 at 9:28 pm
libero–1954 was the W. Germany/Hungary final…Brazil beat Sweden in 1958.
April 24th, 2006 at 11:41 pm
I wonder if anyone who thinks Frank Lampard is one of England’s key players often watches the man play. Surely, surely, Wayne Rooney and Paul Robinson are England’s two key players. There’s no adequate replacement for either.
April 28th, 2006 at 10:33 pm
This piece of shit blogger / commentator is not English.
Sucks that you ruined your nice idea of getting different opinions around the world by adding this fucker to this….
April 29th, 2006 at 1:19 am
Hi pos.
‘Football Commentator’ is English. Maybe you had the confusion as Rui Rocha, a Portuguese also writes at his blog.
Cheers.
May 30th, 2006 at 1:19 pm
Seriously,
He thinks England have the best midfield in the world because of Lampard ??
He hasnt done enough research to merit such comments, comapare the Dutch,Brazillian, French or Spanish midfields and take back your comments.
England will be lucky to reach the quarter finals.
June 2nd, 2006 at 2:24 am
Seriously,
He does think England have the best midfield in the world and not just because of Lampard. You can have your opinions, i’m pretty sure he won’t pay attention to them, as I.
June 6th, 2006 at 4:19 pm
I completely agree with Football Commentator’s assertion that England has one of the best midfields in the world, at least if one looks at it from an individual talent basis. I don’t consider Lampard to be the key to it though, but that’s another matter.
What I certainly DON’T agree with is his opinion that Beckham should be dropped because England “shouldn’t play the long ball game”. That’s simplistic - all teams occassionally play a long ball game since it’s often the only way to circumvent the many overcrowded midfields we’re seeing now that so many teams employ a holding player. A long game doesn’t imply a boring game, as long as it’s just one of several approaches (the Shankly words about “not the long ball or the short ball - the right ball” comes to mind).
Any good side, apart from Brazil who are just a class above at the moment, will need to have the capability to quickly transfer areas of possession from one side of the pitch to another. If one doesn’t want to do that by passing sideways in the back four, one has to be able to strike it long once in a while. Though I completely agree that Beckham is overrated and *certainly* shouldn’t be captain, I think he should be included just for his ability to deliver from deep on the pitch and thus force defenses to quickly withdraw to deal with runners trying to get in behind them. That also has the added benefit of creating holes for Lampard or Gerrard to burst in to (as he so correctly mentioned - teams don’t want to defend deep against England because of their shooters. Having a good crosser in the side makes them not want to defend high either, because of the danger posed by a Cole, an Owen or maybe even a Walcott getting one-on-ones with the keeper).
I also read a statistic the other day that said that over 40% of WC goals come as a result of set pieces (I wish I could remember the exact figure, but alas…). With that in mind, you might find Beckham comes in handy.
Oh well - you’ll be out after the quarters as usual :). Sorry for the length of this post.
June 6th, 2006 at 7:51 pm
Sorry for the length of this post.
No need.. :)
Thank you for the insights.. I also think that Beckham is important for England. Apart from the set pieces advantage and all that, Beckham also has a very good football mind according to me - an advantage for any team.
June 10th, 2006 at 6:41 pm
Hahaha, it’s lovely being able to say “I told you so”, isn’t it? 4 minutes into the game and England are one goal up thanks to… a set piece by Beckham forcing an own goal.
Feels good being smug :).
June 10th, 2006 at 10:34 pm
But England disappointed a lot of people today if I am not wrong.. :)
June 13th, 2006 at 4:24 pm
Not only have the South Americans won the world cup on every continent. The Europeans have only ever won in Europe
February 2nd, 2007 at 5:00 am
azxijjgu
azxijjgu
August 6th, 2007 at 6:37 am
I have to say, that I could not agree with you in 100% regarding Part 3 of 32: The English Interview, but it’s just my opinion, which could be wrong :)