Archive for the ‘Australian Cricket’ Category

Why not a 5th bowler for the Aussies

Wednesday, August 24th, 2005

The more I think of it, the more I feel Australia should play 5 bowlers in the 4th test. Bowling wins test matches and to get 20 wickets a line up of McGrath, Gillespie(before he went out of form), Lee/Kasporwicz and Warne looks strong.

But a line up of a dicey McGrath, Lee, Warne and Tait does not.

Should Australia go with MacGill despite the curator saying it wont support the spinners or Kasporwicz as a 5th bowler? If the Aussies feel the pitch has some thing for the spinners, I would have chosen MacGill as the 5th bowler.

I know the long tail becomes a problem. But equally big if not bigger is the problem of a high probability that Australia will not be able to take twenty wickets with an attack of McGrath (not fully fit), Tait (untested), Warne and Lee (unpredictable).

Really underlines the problem Australia is facing.

highly unlikely the Aussies will go with 5 bowlers though.

The most awaited match in years

Tuesday, August 23rd, 2005

The hype surrounding the Ashes has been proven to be real. With 3 tests gone and the score tied at 1-1, the 4th test is one of the most awaited test matches. I certainly cannot remember a match for which I have had more anticipation in my 14 years of cricket watching.

Champion teams have had their eras in test history. When Australia beat the West Indies in West Indies in 1995, they started their era as test champions ending a 20 year reign of the West Indies. I still do not fathom the current English team will be able to win the Ashes. But the possibility is very real. It is this possibility which elevates the 4th test of the current Ashes series to another level.

Can England win the 4th test? Or will Australia bounce back stronger than before? I am of the belief the second possibility will occur. But cricket is an unpredictable game.

England will not be proclaimed world champions isntantly. But if they beat Australia in England and then go on to show mettle in their winter tours of Pakistan and India, there will be many who will believe England is the best team in the world.

If England cannot manage to win or draw the Ashes, such thoughts of England replacing Aussies as world champs will be put to the trash can. This is why the match is eagerly anticipated. It has much more at stake than the outcome of a single match.

Come on Dizzy!

Thursday, July 28th, 2005

Jason Gillespie has been included in the tour match ahead of the second Ashes test. My gut feeling is Gillespie will cause a huge impact in Ashes 2005 despite his current poor form and will strike hard in the second test. Gillespie is too good to go through such a lean phase for so long.

Pray for Gilmour

Wednesday, July 27th, 2005

Gary Gilmour is struggling for his life. 54 is no age to die. Here is hoping for the best.

Border at 50

Wednesday, July 27th, 2005

Allan Border has  been the key figure in the transformation of Australia from the team which was one of the worst in the world in the 80s to the best team in the world. At 50, he can be proud of contributing to Australian cricket in the various capacities he has, from player to selector. Scott writes his thoughts on the man. He also links to a superb article I missed on the man from former player and one of my top 5 current cricket writers, Derek Pringle.

Adam and Harry Gilchrist

Tuesday, July 26th, 2005

What are you looking at!?

And another sweet picture can be viewed here.

Dont change the playing XIs

Tuesday, July 26th, 2005

There is panic in the English camp. Some people are suggesting bringing in Collingwood for Giles. Others want Bell out and Collingwood in. My advice: This is the best side England has got, most of which has aided England become the second best team in the world. Keep the faith and dont chop and change. It would only make the side worse. England may still not manage to win any test with the current side but what can they do? The Aussies are so much better than them!

Regarding the Aussies, I would say Gillespie should be retained. He is valuable, a potent strike bowler. his recent form has not been good but it is only a matter of time before he more than makes up for the lack of form. Please do not bring stock bowler Kasporwicz and change the winning XI.

On Lee

Monday, July 25th, 2005

Every one has an opinion on him. The opinions are in the extreme. Some wrote him off ages ago – rubished him for eternity. Some believe he has class to mark a decent test career. The Australian selectors and I are of the second category of people. Lee managed to make a come back thanks to the larger perspective of the Aussie selectors. Roebuck presents a superb assessment of Lee:

Not so long ago Lee was in such bad form that he could hardly release the ball. No one present during the Sydney Test match against India 18 months ago was confident of ever seeing him bowl for his country again. He was reduced to releasing the ball from a yard behind the popping crease and left nursing embarrassing figures. A bowler’s pain is public. Dismissed batsmen retreat to the rooms. It might have broken a lesser man.

Early in his career, Lee sampled the joys of the game as he cut a swathe through opponents like a latter-day Errol Flynn. Then came injuries and setbacks and losses of form that created confusion in an essentially relaxed brain. Sydney was the low point. It had looked like the end. In fact, it was just a beginning.

Lee could take consolation from the fact that he was still dangerous with the white ball. Indeed, he was the best bowler at the most recent World Cup. Armed with a white missile, he could bowl with pace and swing, a potent combination. His success in one-day cricket brought him the time that he needed to sort out the rest of his game.

Taken to India but not chosen for a single Test match, Lee dedicated himself to taking his fitness to an even higher level. That he lost weight on the tour was due not to Delhi belly but to his new physical discipline.

In Shane Watson he found a splendid partner in this endeavour. Every evening the pair flogged their bodies mercilessly in search of the strength and speed needed to give them an edge. Ever since, Lee has been superb in both forms of the game.

Naturally, it took time to convince the selectors that he was indeed a new man. Last autumn he toured New Zealand and again could not force his way into the team. He arrived in England as fourth seamer but bowled with such gusto that his candidacy had to be taken seriously, especially by a team lacking a cutting edge. Lee did not play at Lord’s because a colleague had lost form. He demanded a place with stirring performances.

Link courtesy: Mike on cricket

Truly great

Sunday, July 24th, 2005

Watching Lance Armstrong and the Australian cricket team one win his record 7th Tour de France, the other demolish England yet another time, you have to wonder what makes champions what they are.

The England cricket team is good. They will give a fight in the Ashes but it will be a surprise if they can manage to win even one test match. One of the commentators said he did not think the feat achieved by Armstrong today will be emulated in his life time at least. That helps us understand Armstrong’s feat just a bit. The true magnitude, one hopes, can be fathomed in due course.

I have read Armstrong’s highly inspirational autubiography It’s not about the bike. I think I may have to read it and other books on Armstrong in due course.

Truly great.

Day 1: Advantage Australia

Thursday, July 21st, 2005

Ian Botham: “I have not seen a more exciting day 1 of the Ashes series than this.”

Sums up the day.

When Ponting chose to bat on what looked like a good batting pitch as far as every one was concerned, every one was certain a score of 350-400 would be par. The English pace bowling quartet had other ideas though. What was most noticeable was the far too man shots Australian batsmen played early on. Yes, Australia bat aggressively and yes, that’s the way they have managed to get so many victories. But even by their standards, the shots played were more than necessary. One would imagine there would be some maturity to play in during the first session of a test match.

Hoggard took Hayden off a beauty and Harmison bowled accurately, on the good length, supported by Flintoff (his bowling impresses you more every time you watch him) and Jones. Despite some late flutter by Warne, Harmison had ensured it was advatage England with Australia wrapped up for 190.

It must be traumatic to be an English fan. McGrath – the cold assassin, the demolition man, the man who has taken wickets at less than 12 a piece at Lord’s, the man who has dismissed 33 English test batsmen before this test, added some more chapters to his legendary story. After 16.1 overs into the England inning and the score at 21/5, it was Australian supporters who were rejoicing. All 5 wickets to McGrath. The age of McGrath? 35. So much for talks that he is past his best!

Pieterson and Jones had a small partnership but then Lee managed to take 2 to cap a memorable come back. He supported McGrath very well. Gillespie, who I reckon will bowl well in the series, didn’t bowl badly but didn’t bowl exceptionally either. The verdict is still out on him. I thought Warne was brought in a few overs too late. Should have been brought in half an early despite the ball being fairly new.

And yes regarding the pitch. It had a lot more variable bounce in the England inning. Alarming for a day 1 pitch. Nothing should be taken away from Harmison and McGrath who both bowled very well. Thoughts of the amazing Kandy test match where Australia battled Sri Lanka not so long ago come fleeting back during this amazing match. The game hinges more on which team manages to score more runs in the second inning. Australia will manage to have a lead of at least 50 runs now keeping aside some inspired batting with the tail by Pieterson. That will be a huge lead considering the low scoring match. But who is to say Australia cant score a 400 in their second inning. A lot of time is left in this match as there was in Kandy.

It is advantage Australia any way the match is looked at.