<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Sportolysis - The World Sports Blog &#187; ICC</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.sportolysis.com/category/cricket/icc/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.sportolysis.com</link>
	<description>A few wins, a few lessons. Never any losses.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 23 Jan 2012 16:56:01 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.1</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>ICC, Don&#8217;t Ignore the Associates, Please</title>
		<link>http://www.sportolysis.com/2011/03/04/icc-dont-ignore-the-associates-please/</link>
		<comments>http://www.sportolysis.com/2011/03/04/icc-dont-ignore-the-associates-please/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 Mar 2011 23:52:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Pratyush</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Cricket]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ICC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[World Cup]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.sportolysis.com/?p=894</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Ireland defeating England may look great but we have had upsets before. It hasn&#8217;t materialized to much a lot of the times, largely due to ICC neglect. Kenya was great in the 1996 World Cup for instance. They didn&#8217;t get many matches though and ended up having an internal match fixing scandal. Now, cricket in [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.sportolysis.com/2011/03/04/icc-dont-ignore-the-associates-please/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>On the Indian Win</title>
		<link>http://www.sportolysis.com/2010/12/29/on-the-indian-win/</link>
		<comments>http://www.sportolysis.com/2010/12/29/on-the-indian-win/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 29 Dec 2010 12:48:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Pratyush</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Cricket]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ICC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[South African Cricket]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.sportolysis.com/?p=883</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A famous win for India at Durban. What a difference a fast bowler can make. Laxman keeps adding to his legend. I am concerned regarding the batting still but I thought Dravid showed signs of improvement despite not scoring a lot of runs after a long, long time. Pujara in place of Raina is a [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.sportolysis.com/2010/12/29/on-the-indian-win/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Why the subcontinent doesn&#8217;t like Twenty20</title>
		<link>http://www.sportolysis.com/2006/02/25/why-the-subcontinent-doesnt-like-twenty20/</link>
		<comments>http://www.sportolysis.com/2006/02/25/why-the-subcontinent-doesnt-like-twenty20/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 25 Feb 2006 13:35:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Pratyush</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Cricket]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ICC]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.sportolysis.com/?p=62</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A few months ago, Jagmohan Dalmiya made the point on Sportcentre India that this form of cricket is not in the agenda of India for the near future. The Reason? As its 40 percent of a limited overs match (in terms of overs and time involved), it results in 40 percent of income. 
Tim de [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.sportolysis.com/2006/02/25/why-the-subcontinent-doesnt-like-twenty20/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>5</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Bye bye supersub? Thank you</title>
		<link>http://www.sportolysis.com/2006/02/15/bye-bye-supersub-thank-you/</link>
		<comments>http://www.sportolysis.com/2006/02/15/bye-bye-supersub-thank-you/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 15 Feb 2006 13:09:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Pratyush</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Cricket]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ICC]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.sportolysis.com/?p=74</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I will not elaborate further on the joke that has been the super sub. I wrote on it when it first surfaced which can be viewed here. 
I am just glad that it is going according to reports.  A Twenty20 world championship? Bring it on!
]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.sportolysis.com/2006/02/15/bye-bye-supersub-thank-you/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>5</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Resisting evils</title>
		<link>http://www.sportolysis.com/2006/02/15/resisting-evils/</link>
		<comments>http://www.sportolysis.com/2006/02/15/resisting-evils/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 15 Feb 2006 07:37:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Pratyush</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Cricket]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ICC]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.sportolysis.com/?p=76</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A very interesting discussion is taking place at Wicket to Wicket on racism. 
Sport is about trying your best to succeed. If you do not, never mind. At least you tried your best. Applaud your opponent and try harder next time, learning from the experiences of the previous battle.
The sportsmen in the modern era forget [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.sportolysis.com/2006/02/15/resisting-evils/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>A draw if both captains agree</title>
		<link>http://www.sportolysis.com/2006/01/27/a-draw-if-both-captains-agree/</link>
		<comments>http://www.sportolysis.com/2006/01/27/a-draw-if-both-captains-agree/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 27 Jan 2006 07:44:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Pratyush</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Cricket]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ICC]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.sportolysis.com/?p=113</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I had brought this up in this post a few days into the 1st test. Rudi Koertzen agrees to an extent. He says:

There is nothing wrong if the ICC considers a change in laws that allows such Test matches to be called off at tea with the consent of both captains when a last-day result [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.sportolysis.com/2006/01/27/a-draw-if-both-captains-agree/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The new cricket order</title>
		<link>http://www.sportolysis.com/2006/01/23/the-new-cricket-order/</link>
		<comments>http://www.sportolysis.com/2006/01/23/the-new-cricket-order/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 23 Jan 2006 14:28:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Pratyush</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Cricket]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ICC]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.sportolysis.com/?p=125</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I wrote regarding it when it first surfaced. A lot of reactions have come up in the cricketing world regarding the same. Kamran Abbasi has written an authorative article on the subject. 
I particularly like parts of the last two paragraphs:
Leadership, though, carries responsibility and requires values. India&#8217;s unilateral declarations of the past month &#8211; [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.sportolysis.com/2006/01/23/the-new-cricket-order/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>On Umpires</title>
		<link>http://www.sportolysis.com/2006/01/23/on-umpires/</link>
		<comments>http://www.sportolysis.com/2006/01/23/on-umpires/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 23 Jan 2006 04:45:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Pratyush</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Cricket]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[General Stuff]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ICC]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.sportolysis.com/?p=126</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[It&#8217;s not the umpire&#8217;s fault that the technology is better than the past. Also they travel an extra ordinary amount of time which doesn&#8217;t make their task easier. Blame the ICC for not implementing technology where its conclusive and the ICC for not appointing at least a few more umpires than they do currently. The [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.sportolysis.com/2006/01/23/on-umpires/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Superseries &#8211; a failure in execution</title>
		<link>http://www.sportolysis.com/2005/10/19/superseries-a-failure-in-execution/</link>
		<comments>http://www.sportolysis.com/2005/10/19/superseries-a-failure-in-execution/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 19 Oct 2005 12:54:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Pratyush</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Australian Cricket]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Cricket]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ICC]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.sportolysis.com/?p=164</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Looking back, I will not say the super series was a bad idea. I will speak regarding the test match because it is the cricket which concerns me much more than most one day cricket.
The match saw brilliance in parts. The bowling of Murali, the bowling of Warne, some tight contests. But where the match [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.sportolysis.com/2005/10/19/superseries-a-failure-in-execution/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Africa versus Asia &#8211; the crap continues</title>
		<link>http://www.sportolysis.com/2005/07/18/africa-versus-asia-the-crap-continues/</link>
		<comments>http://www.sportolysis.com/2005/07/18/africa-versus-asia-the-crap-continues/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 18 Jul 2005 09:07:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Pratyush</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Cricket]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ICC]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.sportolysis.com/?p=228</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[So the selection committee for Asia for the Asia vs South Africa..  ooooooooops Asia vs Africa contains one member from each of the 4 Asian test nations who is not a national selector as specified by the ICC. 
Harmless clause if you look at it at first glance. But then why were the selectors [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.sportolysis.com/2005/07/18/africa-versus-asia-the-crap-continues/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>ICC &#8211; a disgrace</title>
		<link>http://www.sportolysis.com/2005/07/10/icc-a-disgrace/</link>
		<comments>http://www.sportolysis.com/2005/07/10/icc-a-disgrace/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 09 Jul 2005 18:34:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Pratyush</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Cricket]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ICC]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.sportolysis.com/?p=234</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Mukul Kesavan has written one of the best pieces of cricket writing I have ever read in the August issue of Wisden Asia Cricket. Thatâ€™s saying a lot considering I have a collection of Sportstars, Sportsweeks, Sportsworlds (many courtesy my cousin brother) spanning 25 years apart from usually reading articles which are easily available on [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.sportolysis.com/2005/07/10/icc-a-disgrace/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Should Bangladesh be allowed to play test cricket</title>
		<link>http://www.sportolysis.com/2005/07/09/should-bangladesh-be-allowed-to-play-test-cricket/</link>
		<comments>http://www.sportolysis.com/2005/07/09/should-bangladesh-be-allowed-to-play-test-cricket/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 09 Jul 2005 04:00:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Pratyush</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Bangladesh Cricket]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Cricket]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ICC]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.sportolysis.com/?p=235</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The allowing of limited overs international status for more teams is the way to go. This means more matches between comparable stature teams and less of tri nation series involving two top nations and a Banladesh or a Zimbabwe. It also means financial rewards for the teams which the ICC has specified. This more than [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.sportolysis.com/2005/07/09/should-bangladesh-be-allowed-to-play-test-cricket/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>More and more substitutes?</title>
		<link>http://www.sportolysis.com/2005/07/06/more-and-more-substitutes/</link>
		<comments>http://www.sportolysis.com/2005/07/06/more-and-more-substitutes/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 06 Jul 2005 04:23:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Pratyush</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Cricket]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[General Stuff]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ICC]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.sportolysis.com/?p=244</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The substitutes bring in many possibilities as I pondered over the thought of how they can be used a few days ago. Most of the arguement against it has been the fact that cricket is traditionally a 11 a side game. But if we look at the history of the sport, there was 12 a [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.sportolysis.com/2005/07/06/more-and-more-substitutes/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>ICC doing things right for a change</title>
		<link>http://www.sportolysis.com/2005/06/30/icc-doing-things-right-for-a-change-2/</link>
		<comments>http://www.sportolysis.com/2005/06/30/icc-doing-things-right-for-a-change-2/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 30 Jun 2005 13:12:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Pratyush</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Cricket]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ICC]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.sportolysis.com/?p=266</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[After deciding to have the top 6 associate members the capacity to play official one day internationals among themselves, which will also have financial rewards which is more important and can boost the development of these regions, the ICC has made another major announcement of merit.
The change in format of the Champions Trophy  means [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.sportolysis.com/2005/06/30/icc-doing-things-right-for-a-change-2/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>7</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>And one day cricket becomes more meaningless</title>
		<link>http://www.sportolysis.com/2005/06/28/and-one-day-cricket-becomes-more-meaningless-2/</link>
		<comments>http://www.sportolysis.com/2005/06/28/and-one-day-cricket-becomes-more-meaningless-2/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 28 Jun 2005 14:39:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Pratyush</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Cricket]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ICC]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.sportolysis.com/?p=276</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[What is concerning about the rule changes in limited overs cricket is how much more batsman friendly it makes it all.
The twenty over field restrictions instead of fifteen means more runs will be scored than ever before. The general feeling is that teams will replace a batsman with a bowler and vice versa while substituing. [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.sportolysis.com/2005/06/28/and-one-day-cricket-becomes-more-meaningless-2/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

