Archive for the ‘Indian Cricket’ Category

Tendulkar – The Best After Bradman

Wednesday, February 24th, 2010

200*. Once Tendulkar’s career is finished, he will have 100 international centuries too, a feat never to be surpassed ever because ODI cricket will reduce and T20 doesn’t produce as many 100s. When you compare records of the 90s, Lara achieved more while Tendulkar was more consistent. For instance, Lara made the 375, the 400*, the inning v Australia. Tendulkar came close but no cigar like in Chennai. However, the career of Tendulkar will be so prolific once it is over, he will surpass contemporaries like Lara in achievement.

What about past greats?

Richards was not as consistent a test player with a test average of just above 50. Sobers played the solitary ODI. Hobbs did it in FC cricket but 20 years in international cricket, 30-40 ODIs a year, 8-10 tests, ranks higher in being testing despite the more grueling FC schedule in Hobbs’ time.

You will have to place second to Bradman.

He is the best batsman in the world right now IMO. Sehwag is best in tests but if you look at over all performance including ODIs, Sachin tops. Being the best in the business at 36 is incredible.

There are still targets ahead of Tendulkar’s career which he can aim for and which can make his career even more prolific. Winning a test series in South Africa, then Winning the World Cup, then winning a test series in Australia. It CAN all happen. We CAN dream, hey.

Go Sachin!

Which Team is No. 1?

Thursday, February 18th, 2010

With the India-South Africa series ending in a draw, questions arise as to which is the best test team in the world. South Africa have the better bowling attack while India have the better batting line up. However, when we look at results, India are slightly ahead. For instance, South Africa was unable to win the recent home series against England despite dominating. I’ll put India ahead.

However, the decider will be the Indian tour to South Africa later this year. Both teams has great fighting qualities which were visible in the Kolkata test and this series. I can’t wait for that series to start.

Sehwag and Sachin

Monday, February 15th, 2010

Image and video hosting by TinyPic

I went to the ground with India at 160/2. I thought Sehwag batted superbly despite the chances while Sahin was a bit shaky playing and missing v Morkel and Parnell a fair few times. Kallis bowled well in his brief spell. 5 runs an over meant that South Africa was forced to do negative bowling with Harris and Morkel (bowling outside off), an idea I didn’t quite approve of but it is what Smith had to do to safeguard letting the match get away from them.

The fight back by RSA justified the decision. Both these teams have an ability to come back into the game wen you think they are down and out and it has already happened twice in this test match. This is what makes them such good teams, the best in the world right now.

Sehwag is really the best batsman in the world right now. In the last two years, his average is 60 and he is scoring at S/R of 96. Last 12 months, he averages 71 with a S/R of 101! In ten games. Incredible. (Stats provided by friend Manan Shah).

The pitch is really good. Good bounce, turn, no real wear and tear and still will produce a result. So it will last and either team can one. I came out of the ground after Tendulkar reached his 100, so didn’t see the fall of wickets. Just when you think one team has the upper hand, the other team comes right back in. What a match, all set to be a thriller.

Watching Sehwag and Tendulkar bat was a pleasure. I saw Sachin bat for the last time in a test live and he scored a century. I can die in peace now.

Back Online!

Friday, February 12th, 2010

Hi every one!

Sportolysis is back online as you can see (All thanks to Sushubh)!. I have been blogging on Pratosphere where I will continue to blog about movies while I will keep my sports entries here.

On the upcoming India-South Africa test, India has to win the test to stake any claims on World No. 1 once the series is over. I have a feeling India will at least not lose the test because of the Eden home advantage. Just not losing is not good enough though. I will be going to Eden for the first day of the test on Sunday. Can’t wait. :)

On England Not Letting the Opportunity Slip, A Few Champions and A Few Losers

Wednesday, March 22nd, 2006

A few days ago I asked the question, “Has England let the opportunity slip in the battle for No. 2 and chasing Australia?”

A win in Mumbai is now needed for England to remain in the race. Very difficult but it is the only way England can stop the opportunity from slipping. No one said the battle was ever going to be easy!

England did win in Mumbai and showed strength in the face of adversity. The persistance was evidant in the way England batted in the post tea session on Day 4 – with planning to go for the shots only once England felt safe. The persistance was also evident on Day 5. The pitch had not deteriorated. It was playing much better than most 5 day pitches play. England kept the ball in a line which made Indians play. Ball after ball this line was maintained. There was hardly any straying. The discipline and superb bowling effort was a pleasure to watch.

Defensive mindset

India has been defensive in mind set in this series. In the first test they went for the shots very late. That was when the score line read 0-0. Here the score line was 1-0. So it was unlikely that they would go for runs and risk drawing the series. The plan would be to play out the first session and a half or two sessions and if wickets are in hand after that, see if going for the target during a small phase is a good option.

This is where I think India erred. Defensive play is never a good option regardless of the situation. Dravid almost got into a shell and Tendulkar survived a few close LBW shouts which would have been plumb had they been a bit closer to the wicket. Safeguarding your wicket is needed in such situations. But in the process playing the natural game as far as possible should not be forgotten. If you let the bowlers dominate, they will gain in confidence and get on you sooner rather than later.

(more…)

Munaf Patel Opening for India

Tuesday, March 21st, 2006

With Sehwag missing most of the time in the field in England’s second inning due to injury, he can bat only lower down the order.

Debate between Jawagal Srinath and Dean Jones occurs on who should open with Jaffer. Jones reckons it should be Munaf Patel.

No he wasn’t joking as he backed it up:

I would say Munaf Patel. If he gets quick 15 runs, India could be off to a flyer. Certainly he is wasted at number XI and should bat up higher.

Hmm.

Living in the era of Tendulkar

Monday, March 20th, 2006

Rahul Bhatia wrote a wonderful small piece on his blog where he fears India wont matter once Tendulkar is gone. The following is what I have to say on the same:

Some generations leave their darlings on people. Some players who are chrished a lot more than the game itself.

In these times we forget that the game goes on. It went on after Bradman in Australia and many cherished players in many eras.

For us, who have been priveleged to have our cricketing ‘wonder years’ in the era of Tendulkar, specially Indian fans as others may cherish a Lara or a Warne, and not necessarily to the same extent, cricket will indeed never be the same.

But we will look back and feel proud about being in the same era as Tendulkar. Our love for the game wont decrease. We are likely to appreciate many finer aspects of the game once there isn’t a Tendulkar. We often have done the same (appreciate the game a lot more) when we watch tests of other nations for example.

That said, I am confident it is not over for Tendulkar.

BCCI vs CAB

Saturday, March 18th, 2006

After the news of the FIR against Jagmohan Dalmiya comes the news that Cricket Association of Bengal (CAB) will not host any Champions Trophy matches. A CAB representative wasn’t even present at the meeting. Was it because of the FIR and thus a means of protest? Also was the reason to not distribute the match because the CAB wanted the latter matches? Did CAB put strict conditions because of the FIR? Did CAB put strict conditions at all?

We might never know.

Has England Let the Opportunity Slip in the Battle for No. 2 and Chasing Australia?

Thursday, March 16th, 2006

The English Team was at cross roads in Pakistan. I had written on the same nearly 3 months ago which can be read here. I titled it facing adveristy. In the period which has followed since then, England has enountered a lot of adversity. A menacing Shoaib Akhtar in Pakistan and a series of unfortunate events leading 4 of their first XI to withdraw from the tour of India being unquestionably the biggest external adversities. The internal weaknesses they have shown shouldn’t be forgotten.

With the collapse in Pakistan and throwing away a match England should have probably drawn in India in the second test of the series in Mohali, it has probably let slip the opportunity to challenge Australia for now. From being the unquestionable number 2 side, it has gone down a step in the close battle of the number 2.

In fact, it also finds itself at a position inferior to Pakistan. Pakistan appear to have lost Shoaib Akhtar for the immediate future. However there is some time to go for Pakistan’s tour of England. If Pakistan can manage even a draw in that series, it would mean that Pakistan has set itself above the current English side.

And what about South Africa? South Africa played superbly in Australia. It is now involved in the home series versus Australia. If South Africa can manage a victory or even a draw, it can be accepted as a strong team despite Glenn McGrath not playing in the current series and despite what Chris Fogarty has to say regarding only the Ashes mattering, test cricket is about more than just The Ashes. John Stern analyses the current situation and the mouth watering prospect which lies ahead of us much more judiciously.

India may be finding bowlers (Munaf Patel, Piyush Chawla) who might show some potency in times to come. However, with it playing just 2 test series in the run up to World Cup 2007 and having lost the series to Pakistan (despite it being like a 1 test series), India finds itself behind the pack in this chase. Did New Zealand not go behind a huge distance in one session in their home series versus Pakistan where Shoaib Akhtar wrecked them? It did India no favours that for them that the home series versus England was always going to be The Nothing Series. India in fact loosened their noose in the tussle they failed to win their last series in the West Indies. That they lost the home series versus Australia did them no favours. They have been chasing as a back runner since then and will have to keep persisting. They do not find themselves in the picture before the pyajama cricket – World Cup 2007 is done and dusted with.

Climbing up the ladder is difficult. It requires consistent brilliant performances. New Zealand is finding it out the hard way. It is doomed in mid table for the time being. Has England let it’s opportnity slip by two collapses, one in Pakistan and one in India? The importance is not in that England lost. England would be respectable losers after drawing their first test match in India. The importance was in the manner in which a match which should have been drawn was lost. A win in Mumbai is now needed for England to remain in the race. Very difficult but it is the only way England can stop the opportunity from slipping. No one said the battle was ever going to be easy!

Pakistan does have a small lead ahead of the rest of the pack – England, South Africa and India. South Africa has the best chance to contend with Pakistan. While all this is going on, Australia cannot work out who the right players are for their international side. A side which boasted of depth finds itself bringing back older warriors who were discarded after the Ashes war was lost. The batsmen are not showing consistency. There is no sign of a future Glenn McGrath or Shane Warne. Most importantly, Australia has set such high standards for themselves that they will themselves find it difficult to maintain these levels. Even if McGrath and Warne do manage to play for a few more years, it will be very difficult for Australia to not slip from it’s high intensity performances is now characterized with. Some would argue that the slipping has already started.

Very interesting times to be a test cricket fan.

On The Way Tendulkar Scores His Runs

Monday, March 13th, 2006

More than whether Tendulkar scores runs (which hasn’t been great in tests lately), there is disappointment at large at the way he scores his runs.

I think this is where people are largely mistaken. He can’t score runs the way he did in 1998. I remember he was even more aggressive in his early days and used to get out so much more in the 1992-1996 period.

I do see Tendulkar has curtailed the risk in his batting and removed getting out shots a lot. Despite this he is getting out. So people say he should play in way x, way y. I think it should be left to him to figure out, or him to consult who ever he wants, if he wants.

Just to speak about batting styles, Dravid comes to mind. His one day batting was highly criticised. He has been such a good one day player because he has the batting base required to adopt.

Tendulkar too has the batting base required to adopt. Has his body deteriorated so much that he cannot perform at test level? I strongly don’t believe it but we can only ascertain after he finishes his career for sure.

I do not buy the logic that he has lost it mentally. Maybe he is doing things wrong mentally, maybe he isn’t. But how can a player who has one of the best cricketing brains lose it mentally when mental prowess is bound to increase over a cricketers career.